 |
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: WildBill (William Quinn)
Date: Thursday 3rd April 2003, 2:41 pm
Hi guys,
Having been dancing now for about a year a question still comes into my mind about how close a hold to start with, especially when dancing with someone new and unknown. Clearly, it needs to be quite close to allow a definite lead, but would not like to make her uncomfortable, however, holding too far away might give the wrong impression that you are uncomfortable with physical contact. Is there a general rule of thumb to be follwed? Cheers,
Will
|
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: andy
Date: Friday 4th April 2003, 12:44 am
Replying to: A message by WildBill (William Quinn) posted on Thursday 3rd April 2003, 2:41 pm
|
There's a similar thread to this on the chat part of this board which you might like to read. But the brief answer is to let the lady decide. Offer the dance hold and let her walk up to you and hold her at that distance, don't pull her in. |
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: sweavo (Steve Carter)
Date: Wednesday 30th April 2003, 2:23 pm
Replying to: A message by WildBill (William Quinn) posted on Thursday 3rd April 2003, 2:41 pm
 | |  |  | Clearly, it needs to be quite close to allow a
definite lead, but would not like to make her
uncomfortable, however, holding too far away
might give the wrong impression that you are
uncomfortable with physical contact. Is there
a general rule of thumb to be follwed?
|  |  | |  |
This is not a question that has occurred to me so far (also dancing ~1 year) so either 1) I get it right every time
2) I am an insensitive bastard
3) It's not that important
4) Some blend of the above I have noticed though that when I start to dance with a girl I've not danced with before I will often start just mambo-ing in no grip at all, let her get her feet sorted, maybe shine a bit or just a big grin, then dive into a cross-body and start mixing it up. I dance NY style which requires partners to be very close, so as long as nobody's gender-specific parts are getting involved and there's room for elbows and things to get through the gap, the closer the better. From my limited experience, uncertainty/insecurity on the part of the man are far worse crimes than being physically too close. As long as she's confident it's a matter of technique and not a bit of perving then she seems to be happy! |
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: Jazzman (O Akman)
Date: Wednesday 30th April 2003, 3:29 pm
Replying to: A message by sweavo (Steve Carter) posted on Wednesday 30th April 2003, 2:23 pm
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: Tom
Date: Wednesday 30th April 2003, 10:25 pm
Replying to: A message by andy posted on Friday 4th April 2003, 12:44 am
Good advice. BTW I went to a class in Leeds recently and was surprised to encounter much closer holds than I'm used to in Cardiff (which was nice...) |
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: Tom
Date: Wednesday 30th April 2003, 10:34 pm
Replying to: A message by sweavo (Steve Carter) posted on Wednesday 30th April 2003, 2:23 pm
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: sweavo (Steve Carter)
Date: Thursday 8th May 2003, 4:54 pm
Replying to: A message by Jazzman (O Akman) posted on Wednesday 30th April 2003, 3:29 pm
I'm getting a really sarcastic tone off that post so I'll leave it a while and either you'll explain what you mean or it'll sound less sarky when I read it next time.
|
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: sweavo (Steve Carter)
Date: Thursday 8th May 2003, 4:57 pm
Replying to: A message by Tom posted on Wednesday 30th April 2003, 10:25 pm
Dancing New Yorikan I'm forever being told I leave too much space, despite being one of the least bashful dancers I know
|
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: Jazzman (O Akman)
Date: Thursday 8th May 2003, 5:46 pm
Replying to: A message by sweavo (Steve Carter) posted on Thursday 8th May 2003, 4:57 pm
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: andy
Date: Thursday 8th May 2003, 9:09 pm
Replying to: A message by Jazzman (O Akman) posted on Thursday 8th May 2003, 5:46 pm
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: The Vardon Voo ( )
Date: Tuesday 27th May 2003, 4:32 pm
Replying to: A message by andy posted on Thursday 8th May 2003, 9:09 pm
By "British sense of reserve" etc are we talking about the issue of 'chubbiness'. Some women (a very small minority, unfortunately) actually get a sense of satisfaction if the subject arises due to proximity, but as a rule of thumb I suggest that one should probably be careful who he dances hip-to-hip with if he is at all prone to expressing it. N.B. This etiquette does not seem to apply to drunk Latinos dancing with tourist beginners in places like 'Bar Salsa', apparently. |
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: andy
Date: Wednesday 28th May 2003, 12:15 am
Replying to: A message by The Vardon Voo ( ) posted on Tuesday 27th May 2003, 4:32 pm
If you are talking about being overweight, no. If that's an obscure reference to anything else, probably not either. My words mean exactly what they say.  | |  |  | Some women (a very small minority,
unfortunately) actually get a sense of
satisfaction if the subject arises due to
proximity, but as a rule of thumb I suggest
that one should probably be careful who he
dances hip-to-hip with if he is at all prone
to expressing it.
|  |  | |  |
If that's meant to be some sort of reference to getting an erection whilst dancing then you could save yourself at lot of typing by simply saying so. However it has nothing to do with the subject under discussion in this thread.
 | |  |  |
N.B. This etiquette does not seem to apply to
drunk Latinos dancing with tourist beginners
in places like 'Bar Salsa', apparently.
|  |  | |  |
Drunk or not, beginners or not, it is a fact that getting physically close to people of the opposite sex (without any actual sexual intention)is something that people of some ethnic backgrounds are brought up to do. Brits aren't one of them. Which tends to lead to British couples dancing with huge amounts of space between them whereas couples of other nationalities tend to dance much closer together. That's a fact. It's also a fact that the simple operation of the laws of physics mean that it's easier to dance close together. And that is all we are talking about.
|
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: The Vardon Voo ( )
Date: Wednesday 28th May 2003, 1:48 am
Replying to: A message by andy posted on Wednesday 28th May 2003, 12:15 am
|
Sorry, I was just trying to add a humorous note to the debate in a typically British beat-about-the-bush kind of way which had nothing to do with being overweight. No offence was meant. As for the final comment, perhaps it is a little unfair but then I do know a few girls who have been completely put off Salsa by opportunist groin-grinding from people that were clearly using their 'culture' as justification for completely inappropriate behaviour in venues where consumption of lots of alcohol somehow made it 'normal'. On a practical note relevant to the discussion, dancing very close can cause arousal (welcome or otherwise) for people that aren't used to dancing that way. Perhaps it's the guys who keep their distance because they don't want their partner to think they might be getting excited, whether they are or not. I know I used to feel quite uncomfortable if a girl came in really close for that very reason. I think that's why New York style has caught on so well in Britain - it's just dancing with no room for confusing it for anything else and suits our culture. |
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: Cosilongo (Matthew Cooke)
Date: Wednesday 28th May 2003, 1:23 pm
Replying to: A message by The Vardon Voo ( ) posted on Wednesday 28th May 2003, 1:48 am
|
I'm not sure that not dancing close is anything to do with British culture. After all, ballroom dances such as the Waltz and Foxtrot which are done in a close hold (bodies touching) have been danced in this country since early in the 19th century.
|
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: andy
Date: Wednesday 28th May 2003, 11:59 pm
Replying to: A message by The Vardon Voo ( ) posted on Wednesday 28th May 2003, 1:48 am
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: andy
Date: Thursday 29th May 2003, 12:18 am
Replying to: A message by Cosilongo (Matthew Cooke) posted on Wednesday 28th May 2003, 1:23 pm
 | |  |  | I'm not sure that not dancing close is anything
to do with British culture. After all,
ballroom dances such as the Waltz and Foxtrot
which are done in a close hold (bodies
touching) have been danced in this country
since early in the 19th century.
|  |  | |  |
That's not quite true. The waltz wasn't danced with bodies touching until the early part of the twentieth century and even then it was only danced that way by competition dancers. Foxtrot wasn't invented until then, predecesors to the Foxtrot such as the one step and the two step were danced with a gap between the partners. As also were the various "country" and "Old Time" dances. Historically that's why the "Latin" dances including the most recent "Latin" dances such as salsa are danced in a close hold but with a gap of a few inches (usually!!) between the partners. The "revolution" which brought bodies into contact (which had a lot to do with Irene and Vernon Castle) in what then became the "modern Ballroom" dances never took place in the latin community which was not part of "polite society" in the US (much less Europe) at that time. The Latins (particularly the Cuban Latins) developed the dance steps and styles from English and French country and old time dancing and set them to the (then) new Latin music emerging with it's mixture of African and European roots to create the early latin dances like danzon. The close hold without bodies touching never changed, even when the dances were taken up by the rest of the world in the late 1930's/1940's.
|
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: Dave G
Date: Thursday 29th May 2003, 11:52 am
Replying to: A message by The Vardon Voo ( ) posted on Wednesday 28th May 2003, 1:48 am
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: The Vardon Voo ( )
Date: Friday 30th May 2003, 3:04 am
Replying to: A message by andy posted on Wednesday 28th May 2003, 11:59 pm
I just had this image of Mr Cholmondeley-Warner talking about all sorts of "sordid nastiness and sleazy dirtiness"
No worries. Actually yes, I was enjoying a moment of mirth but it seems not to have tanslated all that well across the ether.
|
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: the_bishop (Billy Bob)
Date: Wednesday 4th June 2003, 2:34 pm
Replying to: A message by The Vardon Voo ( ) posted on Wednesday 28th May 2003, 1:48 am
 | |  |  | :As for the final comment, perhaps it is a
little unfair but then I do know a few girls
who have been completely put off Salsa by
opportunist groin-grinding from people that
were clearly using their 'culture' as
justification for completely inappropriate
behaviour in venues where consumption of lots
of alcohol somehow made it 'normal'.
|  |  | |  |
Yes I have seen this so many times. It is usually preceeded by "let me show you how to dance la salsa" then is followed by lots of groin rubbing. These men will always do this to beginners, never experienced dancers, and the beginners go along with it looking nervous because usually a) the guy is a more "experienced dancer and knows what he is doing"
and
b) the beginner might be thinking - "oh so this IS how you dance salsa, well I'm not sure if I like it much" Which is pretty awful isn't it - the guy has all the power. Someone tried this to my girlfriend (who can dance) and she told him that she was uncomfortable with the way he was dancing and he proceed to shuffle about out of time for the rest of the track. He couldn't even dance a salsa step anyway and mistook my Girlfriend for someone he could take advantage of. He was very embarrassed and served him right! some venues are worse than others for this behaviour, normally the venues like bar salsa and Ronnie scotts where there are less "serious" dancers
|
Subject: So, how close do you start?
From: The Vardon Voo ( )
Date: Friday 13th June 2003, 3:16 am
Replying to: A message by the_bishop (Billy Bob) posted on Wednesday 4th June 2003, 2:34 pm
|
 |