except in situations where I feel that my
f a hand and no offer of a hand until
it'sSo I stand by what I said on that. Cut the
styling down to cope with your partners
ability - partner dancing should be about
dancing with each other. In any case, just what is it that makes you so
certain that he's late rather than you being
early? Avoiding injury (if it comes to that) is a
different matter of course. Well, I don't know you so I don't know. I was
just going on what I see women doing,
especially after someone has just taught a
styling class Undeniably true. But certainly in my view the
important thing at a dance is keeping the
dance going. Trying out new things to the
detriment of that (and missing hand catches is
undeniably to the detriment of that) is wrong.
You should reserve practicing things like that
either for classes or at the very least till
you're dancing with someone you know well and
you know won't mind you trying something out
with them. By the way, that paragraph applies equally to
men - I just happen to be making the point in
relation to women's styling as that is the
immediate subject of discussion. Quite a few women don't do the basic step well
either. Concentrating on basics as opposed to the
frills would improove most peoples dancing. I think the jury is very much out on whether
styling will ever be anything other than a
mess, but still.
No, I don't really agree with that. If you want
to express yourself as an individual in dance
then you shouldn't be doing partner dancing. Few leaders or followers actually ever get good
enough to do this, but lead/follow is supposed
to be a two way conversation between the
partners re-acting to and interpreting the
music. The way a good follower responds to a
lead tells the leader a lot about what he
should lead next. If you are both really good
you can tell the lead more or less exactly
what you would like to do next. Concentrate on that if you want to be a
- really* good follow. And I can tell you from
personal experience that it can be done
between strangers - it doesn't rely on knowing
your partner well, it relies entirely on how
you respond.Styling is (or should be) merely a decoration
used by both the lead and the follow to
improove the look of the dance. One of the major problems is that one or two
teachers (to my knowledge, possibly more) have
started teaching styling as a means to itself.
That is bad for dancing and merely shows how
little those teachers know about lead/follow
dancing themselves.
ften the men don't want women to style That raises a whole bundle of worms. You are
absolutely right in saying that the dance
isn't all about doing moves for their own sake
(or shouldn't be) and if you said that there
are a considerable number of men (women too)
who don't understand that I'd completely agree
with you. It's equally not about doing styling for it's
own sake either. However you also have to be pragmantic about
it. Theory about how dancing should be is all
very well (and something to aim for as an
ideal) but, if you want to have a good
evening's dancing, you have to make allowances
for whoever you are dancing with. For men that
particularly means don't lead overcomplicated
moves that you are not able to lead well
enough for your partner to dance and for
follows that means compensating for poor leads
wherever practicable. |